United States v. Ismael Serrano
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 19, 202121-50012California362 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 19 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 21-50012 21-50013 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 5:13-cr-00005-VAP-1 v. 5:18-cr-00148-VAP-
ISMAEL SERRANO, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Virginia A. Phillips, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 8, 2021**
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
In these consolidated appeals, Ismael Serrano appeals pro se from the district
court’s order denying his motions for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing for
abuse of discretion, see United States v. Aruda, 993 F.3d 797, 799 (9th Cir. 2021),
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for…