United States v. Ismael Serrano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 19, 202121-50012California362 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 19 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 21-50012 21-50013 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 5:13-cr-00005-VAP-1 v. 5:18-cr-00148-VAP-

ISMAEL SERRANO, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Virginia A. Phillips, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 8, 2021**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, Ismael Serrano appeals pro se from the district

court’s order denying his motions for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing for

abuse of discretion, see United States v. Aruda, 993 F.3d 797, 799 (9th Cir. 2021),

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.