United States v. Craig Morgenstern

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 19, 202121-30007California407 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 19 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30007

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:14-cr-00161-WFN-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CRAIG ALLEN MORGENSTERN,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Wm. Fremming Nielsen, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 8, 2021**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Craig Allen Morgenstern appeals pro se from the district court’s order

denying his “Request for Injunction.” We dismiss the appeal as untimely.

Morgenstern’s motion sought the return of personal property. Thus, it was

in effect a motion under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(g) and subject to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the 60-day appeal deadline in Federal Rule of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.