United States v. Craig Morgenstern
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 19, 202121-30007California407 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 19 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30007
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:14-cr-00161-WFN-
v.
MEMORANDUM*
CRAIG ALLEN MORGENSTERN,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Wm. Fremming Nielsen, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 8, 2021**
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Craig Allen Morgenstern appeals pro se from the district court’s order
denying his “Request for Injunction.” We dismiss the appeal as untimely.
Morgenstern’s motion sought the return of personal property. Thus, it was
in effect a motion under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(g) and subject to
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the 60-day appeal deadline in Federal Rule of…