Phillip Sanders v. v. Lai

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 19 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PHILLIP EUGENE SANDERS, No. 21-15074

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:20-cv-00690-DAD-EPG

v.

MEMORANDUM*

V. LAI, Deputy District Attorney; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 8, 2021**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Phillip Eugene Sanders appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his

action alleging constitutional violations stemming from his criminal proceedings.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of

discretion a dismissal for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). McHenry v. Renne, 84…