Martha Barajas Carillo v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 19, 202115-73463California777 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 19 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARTHA ELISA BARAJAS CARILLO, No. 15-73463

Petitioner, Agency No. A091-691-867

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 15, 2021** Pasadena, California

Before: BYBEE and BENNETT, Circuit Judges, and BATAILLON,*** District Judge.

Petitioner Martha Elisa Barajas Carillo, a native and citizen of Mexico, seeks

review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska, sitting by designation. immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying withholding of removal and protection

under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.