Lovepreet Singh v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 19, 202120-71802California864 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

NOV 19 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LOVEPREET SINGH, No. 20-71802

Petitioner, Agency No. A215-680-087

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 17, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: SCHROEDER, W. FLETCHER, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Lovepreet Singh seeks review of the decision of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal from his final order of removal to India.

The Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denied his application for asylum, withholding of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1) and we deny his petition for review.

Singh argues…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.