Daniel Acedo v. County of San Diego
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 19, 202120-55844California371 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 19 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DANIEL ACEDO, No. 20-55844
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:17-cv-02592-JLS-JLB
v.
MEMORANDUM*
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Janis L. Sammartino, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 8, 2021**
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Former California state prisoner Daniel Acedo appeals pro se from the
district court’s judgment dismissing his mandamus action brought under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1361. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the
district court’s dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Acedo’s request for oral argument, set…