Daniel Acedo v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 19, 202120-55844California371 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 19 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANIEL ACEDO, No. 20-55844

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:17-cv-02592-JLS-JLB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Janis L. Sammartino, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 8, 2021**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Former California state prisoner Daniel Acedo appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his mandamus action brought under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1361. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the

district court’s dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Acedo’s request for oral argument, set…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.