Daisy Ozim v. City and County of San Franci

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 19, 202121-15099California395 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 19 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAISY OZIM, No. 21-15099

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:20-cv-05465-PJH

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN

FRANCISCO; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Phyllis J. Hamilton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 8, 2021**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Daisy Ozim appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing as

frivolous her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging a conspiracy. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2). Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th Cir. 2012). We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The district court properly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.