United States v. Jose Maldonado

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 22, 202120-35482California528 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 22 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-35482

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 1:17-cv-00073-SPW 1:02-cr-00091-SPW-1 v.

JOSE GUERRA MALDONADO, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 9, 2021 Portland, Oregon

Before: GRABER and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges, and R. COLLINS,** District Judge.

Defendant Jose Guerra Maldonado appeals the district court’s denial of his

second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his

sentence. Maldonado alleges that the government violated Brady v. Maryland, 373

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Raner C. Collins, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. U.S. 83 (1963), by failing to disclose…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.