United States v. Adam Galliher

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 22, 202120-30228California788 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

NOV 22 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-30228

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 6:18-cr-00011-BMM-1 v. 6:18-cr-00011-BMM

ADAM GALLIHER,

MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Brian M. Morris, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 10, 2021** Portland, Oregon

Before: GRABER and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges, and WU,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable George H. Wu, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation. Adam Galliher, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to

suppress all evidence derived from Deputy Sheriff Greg Holmlund’s investigatory

stop of Galliher.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.