Stephen Ditko v. Fabiano Communications, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 22, 202120-16855California583 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

NOV 22 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEPHEN PAUL DITKO, No. 20-16855

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-04442-MTL

v.

MEMORANDUM*

FABIANO COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,

DBA FabCom, an Arizona corporation,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Michael T. Liburdi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 15, 2021** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: CLIFTON, BRESS, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Stephen Paul Ditko appeals pro se from the district court’s summary

judgment in his employment discrimination action alleging violations of Title VII

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”). We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

“[A]lthough we review every discovery sanction for an abuse of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.