Stephen Ditko v. Fabiano Communications, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 22, 202120-16855California583 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
NOV 22 2021
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STEPHEN PAUL DITKO, No. 20-16855
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-04442-MTL
v.
MEMORANDUM*
FABIANO COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
DBA FabCom, an Arizona corporation,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Michael T. Liburdi, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 15, 2021** Phoenix, Arizona
Before: CLIFTON, BRESS, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
Stephen Paul Ditko appeals pro se from the district court’s summary
judgment in his employment discrimination action alleging violations of Title VII
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”). We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
“[A]lthough we review every discovery sanction for an abuse of…