Mani Karan v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 22, 202120-71812California1,175 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 22 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MANI KARAN, No. 20-71812

Petitioner, Agency No. A205-586-456

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 18, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: PAEZ, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Mani Karan, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review from a

decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding the denial of his

asylum claim.1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 Karan failed to exhaust his claims for withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture, so we do not consider them. petition.

Karan…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.