Mani Karan v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 22, 202120-71812California1,175 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 22 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MANI KARAN, No. 20-71812
Petitioner, Agency No. A205-586-456
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 18, 2021** San Francisco, California
Before: PAEZ, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Mani Karan, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review from a
decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding the denial of his
asylum claim.1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 Karan failed to exhaust his claims for withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture, so we do not consider them. petition.