Krishna Gurung v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 22, 202115-72313California568 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 22 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KRISHNA GURUNG, No. 15-72313

Petitioner, Agency No. A205-540-904

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 17, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: WATFORD and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and KORMAN,*** District Judge.

Krishna Gurung, a native and citizen of Nepal, petitions for review of a

Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) order upholding the immigration judge’s (IJ)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Edward R. Korman, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation. Page 2 of

denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.