United States v. Jerome C. Utz

Good Law
886 F.2d 1148·1989 WL 109960·1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 14659
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 27, 198988-1713California1,966 words

Opinion

Opinion

Jerome C. Utz appeals the denial of his second petition for collateral relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 , in which he contends that his conviction runs afoul of the Supreme Court’s narrow interpretation of the federal mail fraud statute in McNally v. United States, 483 U.S. 350 , 107 S.Ct. 2875 , 97 L.Ed.2d 292 (1987). Utz also appeals the district court’s denial of an evidentiary hearing on his claim that prosecutorial eon-duct tainted the jury’s deliberations. We affirm.

I.

Utz, a former deputy attorney general for the state of California, was indicted in 1983 for violations of the federal mail fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1341 , and of the “travel fraud” statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2314 . The indictment charged Utz and three code-fendants with a scheme to solicit investments in a fraudulent real estate development in Placerville, California. The district court granted defendants’ motion to strike several unproven allegations in the indictment. The jury convicted Utz on the mail fraud counts. Utz and his codefendants appealed and we affirmed. United States v. Wellington, 754 F.2d 1457 (9th Cir.1985).

Utz subsequently sought relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 , alleging the prosecution…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.