People v. Qazza CA4/3

INTRODUCTION

Defendant Suleiman Abd Qazza appeals from the postjudgment order denying his motion to vacate the judgment of conviction entered against him in 2001 after a jury found him guilty of two counts of making criminal threats. Appointed appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende), setting forth the facts of the case and requesting we review the entire record. Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders), counsel identified a potential issue to assist us in our independent review. We provided defendant 30 days to file written argument on his own behalf. After the 30-day period ended, defendant submitted a supplemental brief; this Court accepted the brief for filing. We have independently examined the entire record and appointed appellate counsel’s Wende/Anders brief and defendant’s supplemental brief; we have found no reasonably arguable issue. (Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436.) We therefore affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In December 2000, defendant was charged in an information with two 1 felony counts of making a criminal threat in violation of Penal Code section 422 and two misdemeanor counts of making…