King

King v. Downtown Prime CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 23, 2021B307274California2,885 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/23/21 King v. Downtown Prime CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

JENNA KING, B307274

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC682898) v.

DOWNTOWN PRIME, LLC, et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Randolph M. Hammock, Judge. Affirmed.

Mortimer Law Firm and Thomas F. Mortimer, Jr., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Larson & Gaston and Gloria G. Medel for Defendants and Respondents.

______________________________ Plaintiff and appellant Jenna King (King) appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendants and respondents Downtown Prime, LLC (DTP), Moses Babazadeh (Babazadeh), David…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.