United States v. Joseph McReynolds

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 23, 202120-10115California1,084 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 23 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-10115

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 2:18-cr-01170-GMS-1 v. 2:18-cr-01170-GMS

JOSEPH MINH MCREYNOLDS,

MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-10125

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 3:11-cr-08133-GMS-2 v. 3:11-cr-08133-GMS

JOSEPH MINH MCREYNOLDS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona G. Murray Snow, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 19, 2021** Phoenix, Arizona

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: CLIFTON, CALLAHAN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Joseph McReynolds (“Defendant”) appeals the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.