Harjinder Singh v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 23, 202120-73434California510 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 23 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HARJINDER SINGH, No. 20-73434

Petitioner, Agency No. A201-018-137

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 19, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: PAEZ, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Harjinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of an

order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his application for

asylum. The BIA’s order upheld the determination of an immigration judge (IJ)

that Singh established eligibility for asylum but was not entitled to that relief as a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Page 2 of

matter of discretion. Finding neither a due process…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.