Cynthia Wheeler v. County of Orange

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 23, 202120-56143California244 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 23 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CYNTHIA WHEELER; CURTIS No. 20-56143

WHEELER,

D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 8:20-cv-01264-MCS-DFM

v.

MEMORANDUM*

COUNTY OF ORANGE, a political subdivision of the State of California, ITS

PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION, ITS

CITATION PROCESSING CENTER; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Mark C. Scarsi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 19, 2021** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and BOUGH,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Stephen R. Bough, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri, sitting by designation. The complaint in this action alleges various claims against the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.