Blakes

Blakes v. Superior Court CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 24, 2021C093856California3,521 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/24/21 Blakes v. Superior Court CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

DERRICK J. BLAKES, C093856

Petitioner, (Super. Ct. No. 19FE022202 )

v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SACRAMENTO

COUNTY,

Respondent;

THE PEOPLE,

Real Party in Interest.

In this mandamus action, petitioner Derrick J. Blakes seeks review of the denial of his motion to suppress the fruits of a search of his car following a traffic stop. He claims

1 the trial court erred in finding the warrantless search supported by probable cause and was a valid impound search. We agree. The facts adduced by the officers before the warrantless entry of the car; illegally tinted windows, defendant taking one-tenth of a mile…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.