Scott Latham v. Nvest Sv, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 24, 202120-16164California499 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 24 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SCOTT LATHAM; VIRGINIA DEUTSCH, No. 20-16164

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 4:19-cv-02517-JSW

v.

MEMORANDUM*

NVEST SV, INC.; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jeffrey S. White, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 18, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: PAEZ, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiffs Scott Latham and Virginia Deutsch appeal pro se from the district

court’s order dismissing their first amended complaint for lack of jurisdiction. We

affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Page 2 of

1. The district court correctly determined that plaintiffs lack statutory

standing to sue on their claims under federal law. Plaintiffs do not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.