Miguel Valverde-Martinez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 24, 202120-72058California546 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

NOV 24 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MIGUEL ANGEL VALVERDE- No. 20-72058

MARTINEZ,

Agency No. A099-630-178 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 17, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: SCHROEDER, W. FLETCHER, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Miguel Valverde-Martinez petitions for review of the denial of his

motion to reconsider the denial of his motion to reopen and reinstate his appeal

before the Board of Immigration Appeals. The immigration judge originally

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). denied Valverde-Martinez’s request for withholding of removal and Convention

Against Torture (CAT) protection on a number of grounds,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.