People v. Sanchez CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 24, 2021F078259California10,491 words

Opinion

Opinion

Smith, J.

INTRODUCTION

Rigoberto Gomez Sanchez was convicted by jury of premeditated murder (Pen. Code,1 § 187, subd. (a), count 1); attempted murder (§§ 664/187, subd. (a), count 2); shooting at an inhabited dwelling (§ 246, count 3); assault with a firearm (§ 245, subd. (a)(2), count 4); and residential burglary (§ 460, subd. (a), count 5). The jury also found true enhancements alleging Sanchez personally used a firearm (§ 12022.5, subd. (a)), he personally discharged a firearm (§ 12022.53, subd. (c)), and that he personally discharged a firearm causing death (§ 12022.53, subd. (d)). Sanchez was sentenced to an indeterminate prison term of 50 years to life, plus a determinate term of 30 years four months. Sanchez raises the following claims on appeal: (1) the prosecutor committed error in closing argument by stating the defense attorney had repeatedly lied; (2) the trial court erred in taking judicial notice of the date and time of Sanchez’s arrest and booking; (3) the trial court violated Sanchez’s right to due process when it permitted testimony to be readback to the jury in his absence; (4) the trial court erred by denying defense counsel’s request for a continuance to file a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.