People v. Carskaddon CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 24, 2021C093698California832 words

Opinion

Opinion

Duarte, J.

BACKGROUND

Based on a shooting spree in two locations, a jury found defendant guilty of the first degree murder of his eldest brother at their mother’s home, premeditated attempted murder of another brother and a lodger in the home, and shooting at that inhabited dwelling, as well as shooting at the inhabited dwelling of his former in-laws and their premeditated attempted murders. (People v. Carskaddon (July 14, 2009, C059839) [nonpub. opn.] (Carskaddon).) The jury also found various gun enhancements true. (Ibid.) He was sentenced to prison for an 80-year determinate term and a consecutive minimum indeterminate life term of 78 years, and we affirmed his convictions on appeal. (Ibid.) On June 4, 2020, defendant filed a pro per petition for resentencing under section 1170.95. He declared that he was convicted of first degree murder and four counts of attempted murder following a jury trial; that the prosecution asserted the theory of felony murder or the natural and probable consequences doctrine to convict him of first degree murder; and that he was eligible for relief because he could not now be convicted of first degree murder due to the retroactive changes made to sections 188…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.