Samuels

Samuels v. Hamrick & Evans CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 24, 2021A158688California9,485 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/24/21 Samuels v. Hamrick & Evans CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

SETH SAMUELS et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents,

A158688, A158878

v. HAMRICK & EVANS, LLP et al., (City & County of San Francisco Super. Ct. No. CGC-13-534626) Defendants and Appellants.

In 2013, Seth Samuels, his brothers, and their companies (plaintiffs) filed this malpractice action against their former attorneys, Kenneth Greene, Raymond Hamrick, and the law firm of Hamrick & Evans (defendants). Plaintiffs sought damages for defendants’ negligent prosecution of an action to collect a $1.8 million judgment that plaintiffs had obtained against Pinewave Construction, Inc. in 2005. Like the parties, we refer to this judgment debtor as PW1 in order to distinguish…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.