Bruce Norvell v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Ass

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 26, 202119-35705California482 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 26 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRUCE A. NORVELL, No. 19-35705

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:16-cv-00195-BLW-

REB

v.

BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD MEMORANDUM*

ASSOCIATION; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 23, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: OWENS, BADE, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Bruce A. Norvell appeals pro se the district court’s judgment in his action

seeking declaratory and injunctive relief regarding terms defined in certain

healthcare plans. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal based on

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). standing, Braunstein v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., 683 F.3d 1177, 1184 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.