Bruce Armstrong v. Debbie Asuncion
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 26, 202120-17192California448 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 26 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BRUCE ARMSTRONG, No. 20-17192
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:15-cv-01109-DAD-JDP v.
DEBBIE ASUNCION, Warden, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted November 16, 2021 San Francisco, California
Before: PAEZ, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Bruce Armstrong appeals from the district court’s order denying his petition
for a writ of habeas corpus, in which he challenges the state court’s failure to hold
an evidentiary hearing to explore potential juror bias arising from the Facebook
“friendship” between one of Armstrong’s jurors and a retired deputy district
attorney. We affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Page 2 of
1. The state court’s decision was neither contrary to, nor…