Bernzomatic

Andrew Shalaby v. Bernzomatic

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 26, 202121-55034California919 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

NOV 26 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANDREW W. SHALABY, No. 21-55034

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:11-cv-00068-AJB-DHB v.

BERNZOMATIC, an unincorporated MEMORANDUM* division of Irwin Industrial Tool Company; IRWIN INDUSTRIAL TOOL

COMPANY, INC.; NEWELL

OPERATING COMPANY, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Anthony J. Battaglia, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 19, 2021** Pasadena, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: LINN,*** BYBEE, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Andrew Shalaby appeals from an award of $22,732.00 in attorneys’ fees and

$1,847.91 in costs for violation of a pre-filing order prohibiting him from filing

new actions.

“We review for abuse of discretion the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.