Brugnara Properties Vi v. Kay Brugnara
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 29, 202119-17267California353 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 29 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BRUGNARA PROPERTIES VI, No. 19-17267
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-02787-WHA
v.
MEMORANDUM*
KAY BRUGNARA; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees,
v.
LUKE D. BRUGNARA,
Movant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William Alsup, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 24, 2021** San Francisco, California
Before: OWENS, BADE, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
Luke Brugnara appeals pro se from the district court’s orders denying
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Brugnara’s motions objecting to bankruptcy court orders. We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. §§ 158(d) and 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion.
Morrissey v. Stuteville (In re Morrissey), 349 F.3d 1187, 1190 (9th Cir. 2003).…