Brugnara Properties Vi v. Kay Brugnara

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 29, 202119-17267California353 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 29 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRUGNARA PROPERTIES VI, No. 19-17267

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-02787-WHA

v.

MEMORANDUM*

KAY BRUGNARA; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees,

v.

LUKE D. BRUGNARA,

Movant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William Alsup, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 24, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: OWENS, BADE, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Luke Brugnara appeals pro se from the district court’s orders denying

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Brugnara’s motions objecting to bankruptcy court orders. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. §§ 158(d) and 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion.

Morrissey v. Stuteville (In re Morrissey), 349 F.3d 1187, 1190 (9th Cir. 2003).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.