Snoeck

Snoeck v. Exaktime Innovations CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 29, 2021B302178MCalifornia18,607 words

Opinion

Opinion

Egerton, J.

Filed 11/29/21 Snoeck v. Exaktime Innovations CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

STEVE SNOECK, B302178

Plaintiff and Appellant, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC708964 v.

EXAKTIME INNOVATIONS, INC.,

Defendant and Appellant.

STEVE SNOECK, B304054

Plaintiff and Appellant, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC708964 v.

EXAKTIME INNOVATIONS, INC., ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

AND DENYING PETITION

Defendant and Respondent. FOR REHEARING [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed on October 29, 2021, be modified as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.