Bhupinder Kumar v. Merrick Garland
Opinion
Opinion
McKeown, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BHUPINDER KUMAR, No. 17-73412 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A202-080-566
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 15, 2020 * Submission withdrawn March 2, 2021 Resubmitted November 22, 2021 ** San Francisco, California
Filed November 30, 2021
* The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). ** The panel withdrew this case from submission on March 2, 2021, pending the court’s decision in Alam v. Garland, 11 F.4th 1133 (9th Cir. 2021) (en banc). The panel now unanimously concludes that this case remains suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: M. Margaret McKeown and Jacqueline H. Nguyen, Circuit Judges, and Eric N. Vitaliano, *** District Judge.
Opinion by Judge McKeown
SUMMARY ****
Immigration
Granting Bhupinder Kumar’s petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration…