People v. Miranda CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 30, 2021C092873California4,235 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hoch, J.

Filed 11/30/21 P. v. Miranda CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(San Joaquin) ----

THE PEOPLE, C092873

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. STK-CR-FE-

COD-2020-0003456)

v.

DIEGO SANTOYO MIRANDA,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Diego Santoyo Miranda appeals from a judgment entered following a no contest plea to carrying a concealed firearm (Pen. Code, § 25400, subd. (c)(6)).1 He argues: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence (§ 1538.5) recovered as a result of his unlawful detention and de facto arrest; (2) he is entitled to have his probation term reduced to two years in light of the amendments Assembly Bill

All further undesignated statutory references are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.