Shamaan
Shamaan v. Cotta CA2/5
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 11/30/21 Shamaan v. Cotta CA2/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FIVE
IHSAN N. SHAMAAN, B305682, B309977
Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. Nos. 18NWCV00199, BC583501) v.
SAAD Y. COTTA,
Respondent.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Olivia Rosales and David Sotelo, Judges. Affirmed. Law Offices of James A. Frieden, Benjamin I. Bastomski and James A. Frieden; Czech & Howell and Jeffery J. Czech for Appellant. Thomas Vogele & Associates, Thomas A. Vogele, Timothy M. Kowal and Teddy T. Davis for Respondent.
__________________________ Some years following their divorce, Khulood Cotta (wife) successfully sued Ihsan Shamaan (husband) to quiet title to real property and for nonpayment…