United States v. Dominic Adams

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 30, 202119-10264California397 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 30 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 19-10264

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:18-cr-00035-LJO-SKO-4 v.

DOMINIC DEAN ADAMS, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Lawrence J. O'Neill, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 15, 2021 San Francisco, California

Before: McKEOWN and GOULD, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI,** Judge.

Appellant Dominic Adams appeals his conviction for one count of assault of

a federal officer in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 111(a)(1), (b). We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Because the parties are familiar with the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Jane A. Restani, Judge for the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. history of this case, we need not recount it…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.