Estate of Tyler S. Rushing v. Ag Private Protection, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 30, 202120-16428California2,510 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

NOV 30 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ESTATE OF TYLER S. RUSHING; No. 20-16428

SCOTT K. RUSHING; PAULA L.

RUSHING, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-01692-MCE-AC Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM*

AG PRIVATE PROTECTION, INC.;

EDGAR SANCHEZ; CITY OF CHICO;

CHICO POLICE DEPARTMENT;

SCOTT RUPPEL; CEDRIC SCHWYZER;

ALEX FLIEHR; JEREMY GAGNEBIN;

COUNTY OF BUTTE; BUTTE COUNTY

SHERIFF’S OFFICE; IAN DICKERSON,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Morrison C. England, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 5, 2021 San Francisco, California

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and CLIFTON and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Plaintiffs-Appellants Estate of Tyler S. Rushing (“Rushing”), Scott K.

Rushing, and Paula L. Rushing brought claims in the District Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.