In re D.C. CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 1, 2021B311767California1,750 words

Opinion

Opinion

Perren, J.

Filed 12/1/21 In re D.C. CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

In re D.C., a Person Coming 2d Juv. No. B311767 Under the Juvenile Court Law. (Super. Ct. No. J072398) (Ventura County)

VENTURA COUNTY HUMAN

SERVICES AGENCY,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

B.C.,

Defendant and Appellant.

B.C. (father) appeals both the juvenile court’s order denying his Welfare and Institutions Code section 3881 petition without an evidentiary hearing and the judgment terminating his parental rights to his daughter, D.C. Father contends the court

All further statutory references are to the Welfare and

Institutions Code. erred by finding (1) he failed to make a prima facie case warranting a hearing and (2) the parental benefit…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.