Ramirez

United States v. Ramirez

Good Law
886 F.2d 1320
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 29, 198936-3_13California1,203 words

Opinion

Opinion

886 F.2d 1320 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Diego Patricio RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 88-5025. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 15, 1989. Decided Sept. 29, 1989. Before SCHROEDER, BOOCHEVER and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Diego Patricio Ramirez appeals his conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute and conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841 (a)(1) and 846. Ramirez contends that the evidence introduced at his trial shows that he was entrapped by government agents into committing the offense, and that the government's conduct was so outrageous as to violate his due process rights. Ramirez also contends that he was denied effective assistance of trial counsel. We affirm. 3 In reviewing a challenge to a jury verdict based on insufficiency of the evidence…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.