Whiteshield

886 F.2d 1321 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Frank WHITESHIELD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Manfred MAASS, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 88-3692. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 11, 1989. * Decided Sept. 25, 1989. Before PREGERSON, TROTT and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Frank Whiteshield, a prisoner, appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Manfred Maass and others. The district court held that the defendants had not violated the provisions of the United States Constitution when they imposed $200 of restitution upon Mr. Whiteshield, without benefit of a jury trial. We affirm. 3 Whiteshield was found in a semi-conscious condition in his cell. He was intoxicated from glue or paint thinner. He was taken to the hospital. 4 Thereafter, Whiteshield was notified that there would be a disciplinary hearing. One was held, and, among other things, $200 of restitution was…