Hill

Hill v. Fay Servicing CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 1, 2021B302672California3,835 words

Opinion

Opinion

Egerton, J.

Filed 12/1/21 Hill v. Fay Servicing CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

JOHN HILL, B302672

Plaintiff and Appellant, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 19TRCV00317 v.

FAY SERVICING, LLC,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Ramona G. See, Judge. Affirmed.

John Hill, in pro. per.; Yesk Law and Michael Yesk for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Wright, Finlay & Zak and Jonathan D. Fink, for Defendant and Respondent. _________________________ John Hill filed a complaint against Fay Servicing, LLC (Fay), alleging it demanded repayment of a loan and initiated foreclosure on his property without authority. The trial court sustained Fay’s demurrer…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.