Lmic

Sherrell Steinhauer v. Lmic

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 1, 202120-35837California712 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 1 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHERRELL STEINHAUER; JOANNE No. 20-35837 STEINHAUER, husband and wife, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-01416-JR Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM*

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 8, 2021** Portland, Oregon

Before: GRABER and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges, and R. COLLINS,*** District Judge.

Plaintiffs Sherrell and Joanne Steinhauer appeal district court orders that

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Raner C. Collins, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. granted Defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company’s motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.