facts, sometimes referred to as mixed questions of law and fact.” (quoting

Ramadan v. Gonzales, 479 F.3d 646, 648 (9th Cir. 2007))).

Extraordinary circumstances are “events or factors directly related to the

failure to meet the 1-year deadline,” and include “[s]erious illness or mental or

physical disability, including any effects of persecution or violent harm suffered in

the past, during the 1-year period after arrival.” 8 C.F.R. § 1208.4(a)(5)(i)-(vi). The

agency concluded that Jacobo’s PTSD was unrelated to his filing delay. That

2 determination is a factual one over which we do not have jurisdiction. See

Gasparyan v. Holder, 707 F.3d 1130, 1134 (9th Cir. 2013) (holding that the court

lacked jurisdiction to review an underlying factual dispute as to whether financial

constraints and a language barrier, rather than mental health issues, explained a

filing delay). We therefore dismiss Jacobo’s petition for review of the Board’s

extraordinary-circumstances determination.

2. Jacobo’s changed-circumstances claim fails on the merits. Changed

circumstances are those “materially affecting the applicant’s eligibility for asylum”

and may include, but are not limited to, changes in country conditions, changes in

applicable U.S. law, or activities in which the applicant has become involved that

may place him at risk if returned to the country of feared persecution. 8 C.F.R. §

1208.4(a)(4)(i)(A)-(C). Jacobo argues that the following changed circumstances

justify an exception to the filing deadline: cartel violence against relatives in

Mexico after his departure, his PTSD diagnosis, and his discovery that he was

ineligible for cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2)(D).

We have jurisdiction to review the Board’s rejection of Jacobo’s claim

because the underlying facts are undisputed. See Ramadan, 479 F.3d at 650. None

of the developments identified by Jacobo involves a change to his eligibility for

asylum; they are largely unrelated to “persecution or a well-founded fear of

persecution” that Jacobo has suffered or might suffer in the future. 8 U.S.C.

3 § 1101(a)(42)(A). As the Board explained, Jacobo has not demonstrated changed

circumstances materially affecting his eligibility for asylum. We therefore deny the

petition for review with respect to the claim of changed circumstances.

PETITION DISMISSED in part and DENIED in part.

4