Carlos Campas-Burgueno v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 3, 202117-71672California1,091 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 3 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARLOS ARMANDO CAMPAS- No. 17-71672

BURGUENO,

AKA CARLOS ARMANDO CAMPAS, Agency No. A205-931-001

Petitioner,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 20, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: BADE and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and BERMAN,*** District Judge.

Petitioner Carlos Armando Campas-Burgueno, a native and citizen of Mexico,

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard M. Berman, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

1 his appeal from an immigration judge’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.