Wallace

Wallace v. Wells Fargo & Company CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 3, 2021H046251California1,624 words

Opinion

Opinion

Manoukian, J.

Filed 12/3/21 Wallace v. Wells Fargo & Company CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

LARRY WALLACE, H046251

(Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. 17-CV317775)

v.

WELLS FARGO & COMPANY et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

In October 2017, respondent Larry Wallace filed suit against appellants Wells Fargo & Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (collectively, Wells Fargo, or the bank). Wallace alleged that Wells Fargo improperly charged overdraft fees on nonrecurring debit card charges resulting from Wallace’s use of a debit card to pay for rides furnished by Uber. The claims were asserted on behalf of himself and on behalf of a class of Wells Fargo accountholders similarly situated. Wells Fargo…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.