Heidi Baker Evan Baker, a Minor by and Through His Guardian Ad Litem, Heidi Baker v. I.G. Racansky Mavis Knox

Good Law
887 F.2d 183·1989 WL 109468·1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 14432
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 26, 198988-15056California3,248 words

Opinion

Opinion

Thompson, J.

This appeal involves a lawsuit filed by Evan Baker and his mother Heidi Baker (“the Bakers”) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against two socialworkers who took temporary custody of Evan, then five years old, during the course of a child abuse investigation. The socialworkers, I.G. Racansky and Mavis Knox, appeal the district court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment in which they asserted a claim of qualified immunity. We reverse.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On September 9, 1986, Diane Brodeur reported to the San Mateo Police Department that she believed her 4-year-old son Aaron and her 2-year-old daughter Melissa had been sexually abused by Paul Baker, the Brodeurs’ next-door neighbor. Paul is the husband of Heidi Baker and the father of Evan Baker.

Ms. Brodeur’s report was referred to Kassandra Dills, a San Mateo County so-cialworker. Ms. Dills investigated the case. She interviewed Mr. and Mrs. Brod-eur and the two Brodeur children, and took extensive notes of these interviews. Ms. Dills’ notes detailed the Brodeurs’ allegations of child molestation and mentioned that Melissa had a vaginal rash which might be evidence of abuse.

Within the next two days, the case was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.