United States v. Dorwin Aam

Good Law
887 F.2d 190
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 16, 199088-3594California5,124 words

Opinion

Opinion

887 F.2d 190 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff/Appellant, and Suquamish Indian Tribe, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Dorwin AAM; Ingvard Aam; et. al.; Thomas Berggren; R. Richard Boyer; L.C. Hirschi; Gerald Ibsen; Marjorie E. Ibsen; Joseph R. James; Stewart S. James; Dorothy D. McVay, and all those unknown defendants who may claim an interest in the subject land; State of Washington; Kitsap County, Anthony Schwab, et al., Defendants/Appellees. Nos. 88-3594, 88-3549. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 3, 1989. Decided Oct. 2, 1989. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Jan. 16, 1990. Alexandra Harmon, Suquamish, Wash. and John M. Peebles, Daniel W. Evans, Mary L. Skaff of Steier & Kreikemeier, P.C., Omaha, Neb., for plaintiff/appellant Suquamish Indian Tribe. Roger J. Marzulla, Asst. Atty. Gen., Wash., D.C., Gene S. Anderson, U.S. Atty., Seattle, Wash., and F. Patrick Barry, Margaret B. Crow, and Thomas C. Pacheco, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff/appellant U.S. of America. John A. Roberts and Eric Richter of Skeel, Henke, Evenson & Roberts, Seattle, Wash., for defendant/appellee Adkins, et al. William A.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.