Optronic Technologies, Inc. v. Ningbo Sunny Electronic Co.

Good Law
20 F.4th 466
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 6, 202120-15837California10,053 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gould, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

OPTRONIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC., No. 20-15837 DBA Orion Telescopes & Binoculars, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 5:16-cv-06370-

EJD

v.

NINGBO SUNNY ELECTRONIC CO.,

LTD.,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

SUNNY OPTICS, INC.; MEADE

INSTRUMENTS CORP.; DOES, 1–25,

Defendants. OPTRONIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC., No. 20-15940 DBA Orion Telescopes & Binoculars, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 5:16-cv-06370-

EJD

v.

NINGBO SUNNY ELECTRONIC CO., OPINION

LTD.; SUNNY OPTICS, INC.; MEADE

INSTRUMENTS CORP.; DOES, 1–25,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward J. Davila, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted August 31, 2021 Seattle, Washington

Filed December 6, 2021

Before: A. Wallace Tashima and Ronald M. Gould, Circuit Judges, and Jed S. Rakoff, * District Judge.

Opinion by Judge Gould

* The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.