Doe

Doe v. Sutherland Healthcare Solutions CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 6, 2021B297712California10,250 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/6/21 Doe v. Sutherland Healthcare Solutions CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b ). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

A. DOE et al., B297712

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. Nos. v. BC539436,

BC539844, BC542556)

SUTHERLAND HEALTHCARE

SOLUTIONS, INC. et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Ann I. Jones, Judge. Reversed and remanded with directions. Nelson & Fraenkel, Gretchen M. Nelson, Gabriel S. Barenfeld; Kabateck, Brian Kabateck, Anastasia K. Mazzella; Genie Harrison Law Firm, Genie Harrison; Righetti Glugoski, Matthew Righetti; Law Offices of Kevin T. Barnes and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.