Idania Archila-Portillo v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 6, 202120-71605California1,560 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 6 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IDANIA PATRICA ARCHILA- No. 20-71605 PORTILLO; et al., Agency Nos. A203-607-953 Petitioners, A203-607-954

A203-607-955

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted August 2, 2021 Pasadena, California

Before: PAEZ, CALLAHAN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Idania Patricia Archila-Portillo (“Archila-Portillo”) and her two daughters,

Idania Michelle Ponce-Archila and Genesis Nicolle Ponce-Archila1, petition for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 1 Because Archila-Portillo’s daughters are derivative beneficiaries of her asylum application, our references to “Archila-Portillo” also include her daughters unless otherwise indicated.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.