Belinda Rodrigues v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 6, 202120-70143California1,086 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 6 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BELINDA RODRIGUES; FRAZIER No. 20-70143

ATAIDE,

Agency Nos. A089-703-441 Petitioners, A089-703-442

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted October 21, 2021 San Francisco, California

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and WALLACE and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Belinda Rodrigues is a native and citizen of India.1 Rodrigues

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision to

dismiss her appeal and affirm an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order denying her

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 1 Petitioner Frazier Ataide is a derivative beneficiary on Rodrigues’s asylum application. Like the parties, we refer only to Rodrigues in this memorandum disposition. claims for asylum, withholding of removal, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.