Richart Centeno-Sotelo v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 7, 202116-73958California778 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 7 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RICHART CENTENO-SOTELO, No. 16-73958
Petitioner, BIA A200-806-639
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
Appeal from the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 19, 2021** San Francisco, California
Before: McKEOWN and GOULD, Circuit Judges, and MOLLOY,*** District Judge.
Richart Centeno-Sotelo, a non-citizen, failed to appear at his removal
hearing and was ordered removed in absentia. He now petitions for review of the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Donald W. Molloy, United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. 1 Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal of an
Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his motion to reopen the…