Wisam Asso v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 8, 202119-72426California678 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

DEC 8 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WISAM ABLAHAD ASSO, AKA Pioter No. 19-72426 Violgos, Agency No. A208-598-666 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 20, 2021** Pasadena, California

Before: KLEINFELD, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Wisam Ablahad Asso petitions for review the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing an appeal from the decision of the Immigration

Judge denying asylum, withholding of removal, and Convention Against Torture

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). relief. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1). We deny the

petition.

Our review is limited—factual findings supporting the BIA’s decision…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.